Skip to main content

Outlining -- a.k.a pulling your hair out


Outlining...yes, that organizational craziness that forces you to look like the poor cat above. Yep, that's what I'm talking about today. After reading a fellow blogger’s post regarding plotters vs. pansters, I began to research various outlining methods. The snowflake method is a very common approach that involves starting with a summary sentence (a.k.a pitch) then expanding out.

Some claim this hinders creativity, while supporters feel it keeps them on track. I've decided to use elements of the approach (click here). I like the pitch sentence to begin with. This took me quite awhile, but in developing my pitch sentence for Twisted Root I found that it helps to think in broad terms. A+B=C But the more interesting element of this model is the disaster moments in the story. You know, those moments where you become the evilest writer on the planet and your characters are tortured.

The Snowflake method suggests that you have 3 disasters (more with sub-plots) and an ending, each occupying 1/4 of your MS. Well what I found interesting is that this method suggests that the best disasters are those caused by the protagonist attempting to "fix" things and instead makes things worse.

I have never considered the protag causing the disasters. In my first book most of the disasters were external elements thrown at my protag. In developing Twisted Root I've decided to give this approach a shot and interestingly enough I feel it makes the reader even more sympathetic to the protag.

So this is what I'm looking at:
Beginning of book: Inciting Incident (Ch. 1 in TR)
By chapter 10: 1st major disaster
By chapter 20: 2nd major disaster (Climax of the story, things are boiling up)
By chapter 30: 3rd major disaster (Absolute hopelessness)
Ending of book

I've written out each disaster, and so far I am really loving this method. I am not using it to its fullest—I'm still a pantster at heart. But I do feel that my story arc is already set, each character arc is already set, and I'm guaranteed to have a solid plot by following this method, albeit loosely.

I'll let you know how things go! Now, how about you? Do you outline? Do you use the Snowflake method or another method? And by all means, if you've got a genius method spill it! I can use all the help I can get. :)
M.B.

Comments

  1. I started out as a panster but tried some outlining that was so light it couldn't really be called outlining. It helped me organize the novel better. So, next, I tried a complete, detailed outline and after all that work veered away from it. Now I outline with some details then just use it as a general guide.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haha great picture! It looks like my cat :-)

    I've read about the snowflake method before, but I figured I was too far into my draft to really utilize it properly. However, now that I'm essentially re-writing LC from the bottom up, I really like your idea of quickly writing out the three disasters. I think I'm also too much of a pantser to do more than that, but I'm eager to try this! In my last draft I(roughly) used the Hero's Journey/Three Act Structure, but I think that focusing on making my MC 'fix' her problems will really take things up a notch, and it really suits the tone I am going for!

    I have to say, you explained this concept much better than the websites I was looking at before :-) Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm an outliner. I have to do it or I'll just wonder in the chaos! :)

    My outline just consists of one-sentence scenes.

    I've heard about the Snowflake Method but have never tried it. I'll have to read more about it. A lot of people seem to use it and like it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh...the snowflake method. Thou are a tricky one! :) One of my crit partners is using it and really enjoying the process. I'm not usually an outliner, but started writing a longer work and needed something. I have since discovered the joy! I don't do the snowflake method, but rather more of a: "This happens and this happens and this character gets introduced here." It's more of a general outline to the chapter. It works for me!

    (I'm a fellow blueboarder, btw! That's how I found your blog!)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Catherine -- I just posted on your blog about the 30 day draft/outline. I'm definitely going to get that book tomorrow!

    Laura -- Yes, this method (lightly used) definitely fits your style and would work brilliantly for LC.

    Karen -- I think the SFM definitely helps to work out the kinks of a complicated plot. I think it could also help to ensure subplots are woven in correctly. So far I'm really enjoying using it.

    Word -- Welcome over and yes, I am a die-hard BBer (if only in lurking spirit). :) Your method sounds very similar to what I did when I revised my last book. My 1st draft was such a mess that I finally had to jot down what should and then revise based upon that list. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GRAVITY e-book is Now Available!

Exciting news!

GRAVITY did have a book birthday yesterday after all—well technically today. It is now available in both Kindle and Nook formats! And check out these amazing blurbs for the book: "A thrilling debut packed with action and mystery. Aliens never looked so good."
USA TODAY Bestselling author Jennifer L. Armentrout.


"GRAVITY is a nonstop action thrill ride set in a richly imagined sci-fi version of earth, featuring a bold heroine who knows how to fight, just not who she should be fighting for. Start reading and you won't. Ever. Stop." Jennifer Bosworth, author of Struck (FSG/Macmillan)
~~~ The print version will be available online and in stores within a few weeks. But to celebrate the release of the e-book, I need your help to spread the word! And I have a few prizes available for participating.
Ways to play:
Tweet that the e-book is now available with links to GRAVITY’s Kindle and Nook e-books on Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Must use hashtag #…

Make your readers uncomfortable

I have this one scene in TWISTED ROOT that is…intense. It is so intense that I’ve had reactions all over the place from my CP’s and betas.

Let me start by saying I have a ton of people read my work. An 8 person crit group, 2 crit partners, and 2 that I would say are alpha readers—friends who read tons and have strong editing backgrounds.

So I receive crits all over the place, and this scene has created some interesting responses. One critter went crazy for it, loved it. Another referred to it as slightly icky. I loved that response. :) Another blushed when we discussed it in person. And all of the male critters I have thought it was awesome—go figure. Men have a much higher threshold for uncomfortable-ness, than most women. (JMHO!!!)

Now I’m not saying I don’t adore all my readers. I do. I couldn’t write without them. Each one makes my work stronger. But here’s the thing, I’m keeping the scene, as it is (for now). Wanna know why?

I think as a writer you should make your reader uncomfortab…

Insta-LOVE

I’ve grown a little obsessed with Goodreads lately. Some reviewers seem to love everything, while others hate everything. The logic behind many of the reviews can be fairly funny to read. One such topic for YA has been “insta-love.” The reviews define the term as two characters meet and 20 pages later they’re madly in love, willing to give up their lives for one another.

While I think 20 pages is likely quick for the word “love,” I do not think it is too quick for obsession. Why? Because that is teen love. I have a 14-year-old niece who has a different boyfriend all the time it seems. One such boyfriend “cheated” on her—meaning he went to a movie with another girl—and she said “it was really hard because we were together so long.” So I asked her how long and she responded: “three weeks.” Yep, it took three whole weeks for my young niece to fall for some boy.
I think it is very important to remember our true audience when writing for YA. We are not writing for the 30-year-old women who…